Some 'Boot' arguments

During frequent discussions Açılımlar encounter a little chat about the well-worn argument, let the elements.

Adam, a minister whaling. Opens his mouth, eyes are shut:

'We will not contact anyone, our interlocutor is the nation. "

Of course, will not spoil things, so 'what nation, this nation' do not ask. But I'll ask this question is allowed:

'Muhterem brother, Mr Minister Sir, how the person will receive the nation? Is a place to gather all nations, we will appeal, speaking with your interlocutor meydana filled this nation will learn what you say? Millet tells us the path of the person you are receiving? Nations is your contact, you can fill a place or person as a way to get you, I wonder what these folks say about the Boot will make you to understand the referendum, will go to plebisit? '

Minister at the head are obviously friends. 'Contact is our nation' is not saying a penny.

This could suggest to our brothers Minister: Today parliamentary order 'direct democracy' is not. 'Representative democracy' ... So 'sovereignty on behalf of the nation' s use of the elected representatives of the public vote.

Minister awake or ... Are taken immediately: "We're representing the nation, will not contact anyone, you'll receive our interlocutor, the nation chosen for us, we own our own person on behalf of the nation are ...

Mr. Minister, and he will play himself playing.

Then 'the divider' s questions. You 'I was Kür, Kurds have come problems, so our boys in the mountains, some zındanda, another part in the territory of the other part serhıldanda, many of them children, uncles, daughters, is still established by the party's voters listelelerinde ... 'said the majority and the Kurds in the region also represent that? El answer: Et t that hit them are soldiers, police are holding, are drowned in the ten percent threshold. You do not represent them, according to them how it is represented, as well as t considered? Valid only for you cenah representative democracy? Or Turkey, and then divided into two groups have in the 'homeland', remaining in the 'colonial' to do, anavatanda 'representative democracy', the colonial governor of colonial despotism our news did not go?

Minister to answer these questions instead of talking:

'Will not contact anyone, the solution is TBMM place. "

Whoops ... Apple and pear and is sorely confused. Pear diamond is of the solution in contact with each other scrum is TGNA cart. So in our example the Minister say, in the neighborhood of Manav Kazım person does not accept her a kilo of cucumber bargaining about the price to not approach, Manav Kazım weight to how much of the cucumber to the solution of the problem where you shop Manav is TGNA not say? Do not be a single paragraph that Ape Musa?

We asked precisely this question, the minister's head is in the bulb glow:

'We do not negotiate with anyone. "

Make us regret that we are similarities. But what patience! We continue to tell.

'Dear Mr. Minister, the Kurdish problem, of course, the solution is not a matter of bargaining. Rather, the Kurds in the solution of this problem does not negotiate. How do? They also complete their acquired rights is not even a part they want. Bargaining that is you. You know that the Turks use of all of the rights, but also have to use the rights of the Kurds. The Kurds of this right 'setting up separate states' rights did not request. They want the rest. You want their rights to a portion, and a portion of the bargain would not give.

Ministers are surprised: how does this work?

Is as follows: Kurds in the Kurdish problem, the Kurds want to be the solution of the problem. However, the Turks have no trouble coming to Turkey. Therefore, the Kurdish question in fact have a single interlocutor. He said the Kurds and the Kurds' My will or my representative in the party and the party's leadership.

Minister asks, 'or state that represents us? We are not a person? "

Will contact you in this business, but that person's only reason is that the Kurds to establish a separate state for their indispensable own Kurdish problems of their own Kurdish state or the United Nations and so on through, but at the moment the name 'Turkish State', which you represent the state agency to resolve the They want and you are applying: We know you're the state, and you our 'democratic Kurdish nation' to know we are ...

All of this can be understood from what?