Since the inception of the solution, many people debate 'should be in the process the CHP and Baykal' he says.
Baykal So what does he do?
PKK weapons are not silenced debate without resolution. What is a period of more than 5 months in the silent weapons of PKK Baykal still cause 'is not that this is not' say?
Would Baykal, PKK weapons do not mean to debate without solution? Kurdish issue and the current size of the job such as this one will not know know very well. Baykal So in fact, does not want solutions. I do not want solutions to the slope of the job is not.
What he says: 'Prime Minister met with DTP with the PKK.', 'Real clear, you who do terrorism, owners, so terrorism would be negotiated!
So Baykal 'DTP will not be with! He wants to say. This suggests Baykal'ın does not want dialogue on the Kurdish question. Do not want dialogue, not like in Kuşkususz solution.
Baykal what else does it say? 'Ethnic identity and will always respect everybody, but the ethnic identity of the opponents of national identity, such as the enemy will refuse to put. "
What does that mean? Different identities of national identity in Turkey Baykal as a threat is detected. National identity is in danger of feeling closer to someone who may be sincere in the matter of freedom of different identities? We no!
So what is national identity? What occurs? This definition of the constitution and Baykal's insistence on the part of the defense, 'which everyone connected with the bond of citizenship of the Republic of Turkey is Turkish' is defined. Baykal speech even many of the 'Turkish Republic is bound by the bond of citizenship Laz, Circassians, Kurds, Arabs ... dll. Is a Turk. " he says. Declared that all of the state of blind ethnic identity because of the fact Baykal to meet at Turkishness, the state 'when talking about ethnic kör'lüğünden also acknowledge takie did. Closes with the words Takie güzelleme think. Just 'ethnic identity is the honor' of different cultures define as a very masculine opening (!) As clause!
Come on, get them, national identity, 'Turkey's Kurdish problem, see a Türk'lükte creator, will you? Sure!
Come on, all the different identities of the components of national identity as process clause applies to takie say even if this identification of elements constituting the support is seen as the enemy of why the national identity? Able to do this, or explain the Baykal or nationalistic concepts, definitions and into complex time and effort yutturma must accept the bad faith.
Yes, Baykal Türklük description jammed national identity is at stake is the argument again to update the solution in which it wanted to be not declared, the guns leave the solution is not to talk by saying, çözümsüzlük the parties is declared, the DTP and opinions, even to oppose the dialogue redderek solution by not announcing ediyor. Requirements to take it forward with efforts to squander opportunities for the solution to Turkey is a great evil. 'CHP keep Turkey out of this opening is in the interests' of the words with the intention to confess. Turkey's interest at all, even non-country divide is assumed to sevkeden a çözümsüzlük policy advocacy. 'We'll stay out of this process in the AKP's approach to forwarding to the pragmatist policy concerns are exhibited. Rating concerns, the base of the AKP's intense concern to the bluff bow and to bend time to show. But the CHP is expressly declared to play at çözümsüzlük.
That wanted to join as long as the CHP.
Is this possible? Or CHP, as part of a solution of the problem is how to bring? This, make sure that the Kurds to solve the problem so hard is a problem.
Baykal and Onur Öymen listening to people like CHP, as negotiated by the state almost a 'listening thinks vermezci'leri concessions. Negotiation is not, said the CHP is not dialogue, perhaps the Kurdish problem 'Only I can solve my opposition to the external approach to the solution I'm all' do you mean by that. Who knows!
But the current position of solved! is the position. We do not participate, trübünlere play, do nationalist opposition over the base, is a stance. With the social democratic nationalist arguments run the ball quite a CHP neighborhood, is in fact a long time by çözümsüzlük is switched on.
However, this should see something of the CHP are: Çözümsüzlük the parties rather, the solution of the problem or to be one of the actors is also out. Questions with the most important actors of the Kurds, the Kurds Bölge'sinden does not vote, because of the political actors in the region have recognized as the point of this is not the CHP. Event of the actors will not be hearing olmayanın. CHP to carry this attitude with the plague spot of çözümsüzlük up his own political party in terms of danger out must begin the discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment